Way back in June, if you can remember that far back, the city began the process of banning smoking in parks. I thought it was stupid then, and now that we’re even closer to the ban, I think it’s even stupider. Here’s what I had to say back then, with a few updates. And yes, it’s a cheap way to crank out a blog, but hey, are you paying for this?

The city moved a step closer to banning smoking in playgrounds and parks Monday, as a new bylaw is moving its way through the system.

Proponents of the bylaw — which is already in place in cities like Vancouver, Toronto, Winnipeg, and others — says its a matter of public health. Coun. Amarjeet Sohi, the main booster of the bylaw, was quotds in The Journal thusly: “We do not allow smoking in pubs and bars, but we allow smoking in playgrounds, which are used by kids.”

Well, Amarjeet, there is somewhat of a distinction between bars and pubs, and the great outdoors. That being one is inside, and the other is in … the great outdoors.

I’m no scientist, but when smoke is dispelled into a closed environment, it has nowhere to go, and hangs around, just waiting to go into somebody else’s lungs. But when smoke is dispelled outside, it dissipates into the air, never to be breathed in again.

Now don’t get me wrong — I am as virulent an anti-smoker as you will find. I know this sounds terrible, but when I see someone smoking, my opinion of them drops several notches. It shows a weakness in character that I find very unappealing. When I see a parent smoking in a closed car with a kid in the backseat, I’m tempted to force them off the road, bust open a window and rescue the poor, hacking children.

So yes, indoor smoking bans have been wonderful, a great public health step forward that did not, as its detractors said it would, hurt the food and bar industries. If anything, it probably helped.

But banning smoking outdoors is too much. Coun. Kerry Diotte says there has been no public outcry about the so-called issue, and I agree. But Coun. Linda Sloan said yesterday that she supports the bylaw, because if someone is standing next to her five-yer-old child and smoking, she can say “it’s the law”, to force them to stop.

I have another idea, Linda. Move.

If a hapless addicted smoker wants to take his child to a playground while he sits on a bench having a ciggie, no harm is done. It is not remotely the same as smoking indoors. An outdoor smoking ban is Big Brother at its finest, and pretty much unenforceable to boot. I wholeheartedly applaud the anti-smoking brigade for making indoor air safer and cleaner for everyone. But this just goes too far. Leave the smokers alone to hack and cough in peace.


One thought on “Outdoor smoking ban the nanny state run amok.

  1. Maurice,

    I completely agree with you, except without the judgment of smokers generally. It concerns me that we are over-regulating practically everything that might bother us mildly (idling, dogs), and ascribing some kind of moral value to it when it really isn’t a moral issue. Worse, this attitude is beginning to bleed into communities, where people feel a right to police others in a very non-community manner. It’s alarming and frustrating. But as the bumper stickers says, “Oh well, I wasn’t using my civil liberties anyway.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s